Congressional leaders are zeroing in on a broad funding accord to set new totals for federal government spending into the fall.

Top appropriators continued to near a bipartisan “topline” deal on Tuesday to slate the overarching budget caps for military and non-defense agency spending, as well as ground rules for hashing out the details of a final package. Once they strike that compromise, spending leaders are expected to quickly wrap up a sweeping 12-bill bundle to fund the federal government through September.

Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), his party’s top appropriator in the Senate, said he talked to House Appropriations Chair Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) on Tuesday afternoon. „We’re still talking,“ Shelby said. „We’re close.“

Since it could take several weeks to complete the final package once they reach an initial deal, lawmakers are set to pass a short-term spending patch that would punt the next funding deadline to March 11, avoiding a government shutdown at the end of next week. The House plans to vote on that stopgap funding bill Tuesday afternoon, followed by Senate action sometime before federal cash runs out at midnight on Feb. 18.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said Tuesday that he hopes Congress can pass the final funding package during the second week of March, within a week of President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address. Many Democrats expect Biden to tout the funding package as a major achievement in that speech, particularly as many parts of his agenda languish in the Senate.

House Democratic leaders anticipate a challenging effort to get enough votes to pass the final package, since the deal is sure to boost defense spending well beyond Biden’s request to increase military funding by less than 2 percent. While many progressive Democrats have called for substantially slashing the Pentagon’s budget, they could have to weigh supporting a military increase of at least 5 percent.

“It may not be everything that everybody wants, but it will be a good bill,” Hoyer said on Tuesday, when asked about the backlash expected from some progressives.

The end result will be “much much better” than continuing with stopgap spending, the majority leader said. Congress has already passed two of those short-term patches since the fiscal year started in October, dragging out funding levels set at the end of Donald Trump’s presidency. Republicans have for months threatened to force a “full-year” stopgap if Democrats wouldn’t acquiesce to their funding demands, an outcome that would lock in those Trump-era totals until the end of September, just before the GOP hopes to take back control of both chambers in the midterm elections.

“I’m astounded that this is how we operate,” said a frustrated Rep. Rep. Cindy Axne (D-Iowa), who came to Congress in the middle of a government shutdown and has since voted for nine funding patches in three years. “I will always vote to keep government open, but this is not the way we should be getting it done.”

After four months of stopgap spending, defense leaders are pleading with lawmakers in both parties to find bipartisan compromise on funding the government to end the string of patches.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Mark Milley addressed lawmakers during a classified briefing last week on the Russia-Ukraine situation, warning that temporary funding is hurting the Pentagon just as U.S. leaders move to bulk up military presence on the eastern flank of NATO, according to lawmakers who attended the meeting.

Senate Minority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell said Tuesday that Pentagon leaders “badly need our country to escape the hamster wheel of chronic” spending patches. But the Kentucky Republican also reiterated three demands that have complicated bipartisan funding negotiations for months.

McConnell insists on equal increases in defense and non-defense spending, the inclusion of “legacy riders” like the Hyde amendment ban on federal funding for abortions and the removal of any „poison-pill“ funding stipulations Democrats are seeking. “With these basic things, a bipartisan deal should be achievable. Without them, it will be impossible,” the minority leader said on the Senate floor.

Connor O’Brien contributed to this report.

Kommentieren Sie den Artikel

Bitte geben Sie Ihren Kommentar ein!
Bitte geben Sie hier Ihren Namen ein